ESM Institute
← All free contentESM

Turning 'not helpful' into a fix

Esm

· 1 min read

'Not helpful' is free, honest feedback, and most of it goes nowhere. Turn that click into a fix.

In brief

Someone just clicked not helpful. What happens next? In most organisations, nothing. The click is counted, it goes into a report, and nobody reads the report. Meanwhile the article stays exactly as it was. The next person reads it, gets stuck in the same place, and rings the service desk anyway. Not helpful is one of the most honest signals you will ever get. Someone tried to help themselves, and we let them down. They told us, for free. This article argues that a signal with no owner is just noise, and that every not helpful click should land with a named person who can act on it. Keep the process small and specific: send it to the article's owner, ask the reader one short question about what was missing, and give the owner a sensible time to respond. Then close the loop. Fix the article, retire it, or explain why it stays, and where you can, tell the person who flagged it. Watch the pattern, not just the clicks. Three not helpful votes on the same article in a week is not bad luck. It is a fault report. The goal is not a better score. It is fewer people stuck in the same place twice.

Someone just clicked "not helpful". What happens next?

In most organisations, nothing. The click is counted. It goes into a report. Nobody reads the report.

Meanwhile the article stays exactly as it was. The next person reads it, gets stuck in the same place, and rings the service desk anyway.

"Not helpful" is one of the most honest signals you will ever get. Someone tried to help themselves, and we let them down. They told us. For free.

A signal with no owner is just noise

Every "not helpful" should land with a named person who can act on it.

Make it small and specific:

  • Send it to the article's owner.
  • Ask the reader one short question: what was missing?
  • Give the owner a sensible time to respond.

Then close the loop. Fix the article, retire it, or explain why it stays. And where you can, tell the person who flagged it.

Watch the pattern, not just the clicks

Three "not helpful" votes on the same article in a week is not bad luck. It is a fault report.

The goal is not a better score. It is fewer people stuck in the same place twice.

Next step

When did your last "not helpful" turn into a fix? Join the conversation on ESM's Exchange: https://exchange.esm.institute

Tags: knowledge management, service management, self-service, ESM

Join the Exchange free

Join free to unlock the complete knowledge library.

Founder membership is free for life

More from Esm

Related articles

More on ESM →