Managing Known Errors and Workarounds
ESMi Knowledge Team
· 3 min read
In brief
Managing known errors and workarounds means recording what has been learned so services are restored faster and risk is controlled until a permanent resolution is delivered. The known error record is part of problem management, which converts recurring pain and risk into investigation, known errors and preventive action.
- Describe the symptoms and the affected services clearly.
- Document safe workaround steps and test them before publishing, since untested workarounds are a named pitfall. Invite the people who use them to test whether they are usable in practice.
- Define validation and an expiry for each known error, so temporary fixes do not silently become permanent and risks and limitations are not hidden.
- Link known errors to incidents, changes and knowledge. In the article's example, support staff use a validated workaround while the service owner decides whether the permanent fix justifies its cost.
- Measure workaround success, time saved and expired known errors together. Use workaround success as the starting signal, but compare it with time saved before deciding whether an intervention worked, and review trends with both providers and consumers. Evidence of risk should lead to an owner and a proportionate action.
Continue reading on the Exchange
Join or sign in to read the complete article and explore the full knowledge library.
Founder membership is free for life
More from ESMi Knowledge Team
Available to members.
Related articles
Members
Problem Management for Permanent Improvement
Problem management reduces the likelihood and impact of incidents by identifying causes, managing known errors and driving preventive change.
Members
When an Incident Should Become a Problem Record
A problem record is justified when deeper investigation or coordinated prevention is needed beyond restoring one incident.
Members
Using Five Whys Without Oversimplifying Causes
Five Whys is a prompt for deeper causal inquiry, not proof that a complex failure has one linear root cause.
Members
Using Pareto Analysis to Focus Improvement
Pareto analysis helps teams concentrate on the categories that contribute most to impact, while preserving awareness of rare high-risk events.
Members
Building an Ishikawa Diagram for Complex Problems
A fishbone diagram broadens investigation across people, process, technology, information, environment and suppliers before hypotheses are tested.
Members
Identifying Single Points of Failure
Single-point-of-failure analysis reveals components, roles, information or suppliers whose loss can break a service without a viable alternative.
